|
Obama shows presidential leadership before he takes office
Dr. Sherman N. Miller
11/30/08
As I watch President-Elect Barack Obama form his cabinet, I find myself
guesstimating his strategic path. The President-Elect appears to be
taking his guidance from the teachings of two business leadership gurus.
They are John P. Kotter, author of “Leading
Change,” and John C. Maxwell, author of “The
21 Indispensable Qualities of a Leader.”
President-Elect Obama is introducing his financial teams with the
apparent approval of the American people and Wall Street because you
hear no outcries and the stock market rose roughly 1000 points with his
demonstrating leadership on the current economic crisis. However, some
reporters want to criticize Obama for appointing retreads from former
President Bill Clinton’s team. Obama makes it clear that we are in the
greatest economic nightmare since the Great Depression; thus, it would
be foolhardy to attempt to tackle such a complex situation with a host
of inexperienced people.
Hence, Obama is opting for finding the best minds for his teams versus
succumbing to political patronage for some political hacks that may not
have the wherewithal to work at the level demanded by the nation’s
crises. Maxwell’s TEACH concept appears to fit into Obama’s financial
teams appointment effort:
If you notice in Obama’s late November 2008 press conferences, he showed
a clear understanding of the importance of the current economic crisis
scourging the nation. He took his time to identify a diversity of high
caliber people and charged them to seek solutions to the economic crisis
in a meaningful time period. These people are expected to brainstorm
ideas and bring some options on which the President can decide. He will
implement the best of these solutions.
Kotter offers a definition of what the Obama leadership role should be
in this turnaround effort. “Leadership defines what the future should
look like, aligns people with that vision, and inspires them to make it
happen despite the obstacles.”
Obama recognizes that “groupthink” can be nightmarish when getting a
bunch of likeminded brilliant people working together. Groupthink might
be defined loosely as a group of people deciding to go in a given
direction when individually they may think it is lunacy. Therefore,
Obama hopes to prevent this groupthink nightmare by appointing an
Economic Advisory Panel that is outside of The White House loop to look
over everyone else’s shoulders. Paul A. Volcker and future panel members
should bring a sense of independent thought, thereby becoming Obama’s
insurance against the groupthink gremlin.
I am sure Obama understands that one of the key elements in change is
creating a sense of urgency. Kotter offers, “Establishing a sense of
urgency is crucial to gaining needed cooperation. With complacency high,
transformations usually go nowhere because few people are even
interested in working on the change problem. With urgency low, it’s
difficult to put together a group with enough power and credibility to
guide the effort or to convince key individuals to spend the time
necessary to create and communicate a change vision. In those rare
circumstances in which a committed group does exist inside a canyon of
complacency, its members may be able to identify the general direction
for change, to reorganize, and to cut staffing levels.”
Obama is forming his leadership team with a charter for change, so it
appears that he is creating Kotter’s third condition where there is a
committed group in a canyon of complacency. Time will tell us if
President-Elect Barack Obama is able to foster change in Washington.
It is common knowledge that the US has one president at a time.
On the other hand, would it not
be disingenuous if President-Elect Barack Obama did not show that he is
very capable of handling the crises that are being dropped into his lap?
|