Is Reverend Jeremiah Wright a Relic of the Black Militant Epoch?

By

Sherman N. Miller

3/15/2008

As I watched the disquieting videos of the Reverend Jeremiah Wright Jr., retired Pastor Chicago’s Trinity United Church of Christ, his caustic rhetoric sounded like something from so-called militant black leaders in the late 1960s and 1970s. This caustic speechifying appeared to be directed at making White America feel guilt and shame for yesteryear’s enslavement and total humiliation of Black Americans. More caustic the language was the more freedom that it suggested because such language might have gotten a black labeled as an uppity N----- and lynched in yesteryear.

Senator Barack Obama was a child during the heyday of Reverend Wright’s caustic language. This caustic language may be music to the ears of some first generation blacks of the civil rights epoch for it suggests some black dignity in the economic mainstream.

Obama was raised by white family members using the White American mindset that may not have included a daily dose of a defrocking of the slave mentality that Wright’s messages attempts to signify. Furthermore, Obama’s white mother was a real social activist, so she was a role model for him to emulate in doing public service. Hence, Obama naturally thinks in a mainstream mindset that has some civil rights era blacks questioning whether he is black enough. The black community appears to have written off these civil rights era relics because Obama has captured the black vote intact.  

A closer look at the Wright videos showed that his church was full. This meant that Reverend Wright’s message was resonating with his congregation because these people got up on Sunday morning to attend service. My late mother played the piano for black churches during my youth, so I recall two things these churches had in abundance: passionate preachers and good choirs. It was not uncommon to hear some one say that preacher can really preach.

The high spiritedness of the Black Protestant Church service may be difficult for many mainstream whites to appreciate who may be accustomed to more ritualistic services. On the other hand, you may find inner city white churches’ struggling to get new members as the Angel of Death empties their pews while black churches may thrive in these same neighborhoods.

In January 2008 at a celebration of the birthday of the Reverend Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. at Christ Our King Catholic Church in Wilmington, DE, it was interesting to see a Catholic priest morph from a stodgy ritualistic speaker into a passionate preacher that brought an emotional experience to the attendees.  The attendees were about half black and white.

As I listened closely to Father Michael Carrier’s message, I heard him speak positively of Malcolm X.  I asked why he made positive comments on Malcolm X. He replied that Malcolm X name was on the list of names from which he had to work. If he had said something positive about Minister Louis Farrakhan would people have walked out? I do not think they would have because I attended a COK activity where a Muslim minister spoke to a receptive audience.

If you take a hard look at life in inner city Black America, it is wrought with crime, murder, and incarceration. There are roughly one million black people in jail today. It is no longer yesteryear killing styles where whites were lynching blacks. Today, it is blacks murdering blacks. If Farrakhan can prevent the lamenting of black mothers on the evening news from their sons getting murdered over foolish gang activity, then it is tomfoolery to attempt to not pay respect to his good deeds.

Explain to me how Rush Limbaugh can encourage Republicans to vote in the Democratic Party Ohio and Texas primaries for Senator Hillary Clinton to keep the Democrats from choosing a Presidential standard bearer yet the media was ballyhooing Clinton’s comeback without critically examining the Limbaugh factor on the same stage? It appears that the national media is now a de facto instrument that Rush Limbaugh is exploiting to dictate that the Obama and Clinton race will stay close. Limbaugh is wise enough to know that the media must beat the bushes looking for obtuse issues to ballyhoo, since the key positional differences between Obama and Clinton are he is the symbolic messenger of a new direction and hope.

Today, the US economy is teetering on a major downturn with people losing their homes and jobs, so the nation urgently needs a new vision.  Perhaps, Senator Barack Obama’s major asset is he comes from a humble beginning where he can empathize with the plight of America’s poor instead of being wealthy where he only shows sympathy for the financially strapped Americans.