|
January 2, 2007
When
historians look back at 2006 it will be difficult for them to
understand how the synergistic relationship once shared between
big oil companies and automobile companies became prey to the
illusion of shortages. Whenever the media reported on some world
crisis or pending bad weather, this bad news offered
justification to the oil speculators to raise the price of oil a
few more dollars which became an escalating tax on the American
workers. The US Government appeared impotent in stopping this
economic carnage.
As a small stockholder of the Ford Motor Company, I feel
great stress to read reports such as “DEARBORN, Mich, Nov. 29,
2006 – As part of a key objective of its North American
turnaround plan, Ford Motor Company confirmed today that so far
this year about 38,000 of its UAW-represented hourly workers
have accepted package offerings for voluntary separations from
the company”
http://media.ford.com . This news report suggests that there
is economic carnage currently underway in the United States
with the loss of 38,000 high paying American jobs and the loss
of quality customers for the host of industries that depend on
these people’s paychecks. It is like legitimizing socioeconomic
genocide of a small US city.
Nieman Watchdog’s June 14, 2006 article, “For
oil industry, profits are one big shell game,”
is very disquieting. This article has credence
when you consider that Nieman Watchdog has an academic
underpinning of the Nieman Foundation for Journalism at
Harvard
University.
“The (oil) industry claims that the current
high level of profit simply represents the workings of the
market – resulting from temporary supply interruptions. High
prices are necessary to efficiently reallocate the short supply
to where it is most needed. This efficient allocation, however,
comes at an extraordinarily high price. Does efficiency really
require the transfer of billions of dollars from consumers to
oil companies? If, as we may expect, we are likely to see future
supply problems, how much of this ‘efficiency’ can we afford?”
The Associated Press puts a dollar figure
on the economic carnage presently forcing many American people
into economic servitude in a July 21, 2006 article, “Oil
industry Q2 profits bubble higher.”
“Whatever the political fallout, the
industry has done right by Wall Street's standards. The five oil
behemoths releasing quarterly results next week — BP
(BP), ConocoPhillips
(COP), Chevron
(CVX), ExxonMobil
(XOM) and Royal Dutch Shell
(RDSA)— earned an estimated $33.6 billion, 32% more than a
year earlier, according to analysts surveyed by Thomson
Financial.”
Imagine how many good American jobs would
be saved if the
US
automobile industry was making 15 billion dollars profits per
year versus their evading bankruptcy. When I was a young man I
might have heard statements like, “What is good for General
Motors is good for America.” I might have heard
something to the effect that GM stood for generous motors. If
there is any substance in these statements, we might argue that
America’s dependence on foreign
oil is morphing into the economic fissure that is rapidly
leading to the fall of the world capitalist experiment.
Will 2007 become the year that America stops paying lip-service to energy
independence and continues to import the
Third World
mindset of having two classes of people – rich and poor? Perhaps
the speculators are quietly celebrating the decimation of the
middle class for middle class people may reunite into a
resurgence of America’s once strong labor unions.
It is now time for the prosperity pendulum on growth of the
labor movement to sway back in the direction of a rebirth of the
working men and women sharing in the bounty of the
United States of America. On
the other hand, the speculator may want to be highly concerned
because today’s outsourcers may find themselves vilified as
tomorrow’s economic villains.
|